Limited launch bonus:Double your AI credits for 3 months when you start today

Free tool

Free AI Slop Detector

Paste a post, email or article and check it against 120 patterns that make writing read like AI slop. You get a verdict, the problems highlighted in red and a fix for each one. It checks the writing, not who wrote it.

0 / 5,000

Checks against 120 AI slop patterns. It doesn't guess who wrote the text, and FeedHive doesn't store it.

Your result will appear here

Paste at least 40 characters. You'll get a verdict, the slop highlighted in red and a fix for each pattern.

The full list

120 signs of AI writing

These are the patterns the detector checks for, each with a bad example and a plain rewrite. One on its own is rarely a problem; clusters are. The list is open source on GitHub, with a skill you can give to Claude, ChatGPT or your coding agent.

Vocabulary

Words that show up far more often in AI output than in human writing. One is a coincidence; three in a paragraph is a pattern.

  • V-01Delve and friends

    delve, dive into, deep dive, unpack, explore (for "discuss").

    Bad: "Let's delve into the data."

    Better: "Here is what the data shows."

  • V-02Tapestry words

    tapestry, landscape, realm, sphere, ecosystem, fabric (used abstractly).

    Bad: "the ever-evolving landscape of marketing."

    Better: "marketing in 2026" or name the actual change.

  • V-03Testament and beacon

    testament to, beacon of, embodiment of, hallmark of.

    Bad: "The launch is a testament to the team's dedication."

    Better: "The team shipped it in six weeks."

  • V-04Pivotal and crucial

    pivotal, crucial, vital, paramount, critical (as decoration).

    Bad: "plays a pivotal role in growth."

    Better: "drives 40% of signups."

  • V-05Showcase verbs

    showcase, highlight, underscore, emphasize, spotlight (as commentary verbs).

    Bad: "The results underscore the importance of testing."

    Better: "Testing caught three bugs before launch."

  • V-06Foster and cultivate

    foster, cultivate, nurture (applied to abstract things).

    Bad: "fostering a culture of innovation."

    Better: Say what the team actually does.

  • V-07Leverage and utilize

    leverage, utilize, harness, capitalize on.

    Bad: "Leverage AI to streamline your workflow."

    Better: "Use AI to draft the weekly report."

  • V-08Elevate and enhance

    elevate, enhance, empower, supercharge, unlock, amplify.

    Bad: "Elevate your content strategy."

    Better: Name the result: "Post three times a week without writing on weekends."

  • V-09Seamless and robust

    seamless, robust, cutting-edge, state-of-the-art, best-in-class, world-class.

    Bad: "a seamless, robust solution."

    Better: "it syncs in under a second and hasn't gone down this year."

  • V-10Intricate and multifaceted

    intricate, multifaceted, nuanced, complex (as filler).

    Bad: "the intricate interplay of factors."

    Better: Name two of the factors.

  • V-11Meticulous

    meticulous, meticulously, painstakingly, carefully crafted.

    Bad: "meticulously crafted templates."

    Better: "templates tested on 200 posts."

  • V-12Vibrant and rich

    vibrant, rich, bustling, thriving, dynamic.

    Bad: "a vibrant community of creators."

    Better: "4,000 creators who post weekly."

  • V-13Journey and embark

    journey, embark, navigate, voyage, path (for ordinary processes).

    Bad: "embark on your SEO journey."

    Better: "start with your top ten pages."

  • V-14Game changer

    game changer, revolutionary, groundbreaking, transformative, paradigm shift.

    Bad: "This feature is a game changer."

    Better: Say what changes and for whom.

  • V-15Transition adverbs

    Additionally, Furthermore, Moreover, Notably, Importantly (opening sentences).

    Bad: "Additionally, the tool supports exports."

    Better: "It also exports to CSV."

  • V-16Empty intensifiers

    truly, incredibly, deeply, profoundly, remarkably, fundamentally.

    Bad: "a truly remarkable result."

    Better: Give the number that makes it remarkable.

  • V-17Quietly

    quietly, silently, subtly (adding drama to plain events).

    Bad: "Costs quietly crept up."

    Better: "Costs rose 12% in March."

  • V-18Align and resonate

    align with, resonate with, speak to, in line with.

    Bad: "content that resonates with your audience."

    Better: "posts your audience replies to."

  • V-19Key as an adjective

    key insight, key takeaway, key factor, key role.

    Bad: "The key takeaway is consistency."

    Better: "Post on the same days every week."

  • V-20Era words

    in today's fast-paced world, in the digital age, in an era of, now more than ever.

    Bad: "In today's fast-paced digital world, content is king."

    Better: Cut it and start with the point.

Stock phrases

Ready-made phrases that fill space without adding meaning.

  • P-01Worth noting

    it's worth noting, it's important to note, it should be noted.

    Bad: "It's worth noting that the API is rate limited."

    Better: "The API allows 100 calls a minute."

  • P-02At its core

    at its core, at the end of the day, when all is said and done, ultimately.

    Bad: "At its core, marketing is about people."

    Better: Delete, or say something specific about people.

  • P-03When it comes to

    when it comes to, in terms of, with regard to, in the world of.

    Bad: "When it comes to scheduling, timing matters."

    Better: "Posts at 9am get more reach than posts at 3pm."

  • P-04Let's dive in

    let's dive in, let's get started, buckle up, without further ado.

    Bad: "Ready? Let's dive in!"

    Better: Start with the first point.

  • P-05Plays a role

    plays a role in, contributes to, is a factor in.

    Bad: "Hashtags play a role in reach."

    Better: "Posts with 3 to 5 hashtags reached more people in our test."

  • P-06Stands as

    stands as, serves as, functions as, acts as (instead of "is").

    Bad: "The dashboard serves as a central hub."

    Better: "The dashboard shows every scheduled post."

  • P-07Navigate the complexities

    navigate the complexities of, the ins and outs of, the nuances of.

    Bad: "helping you navigate the complexities of SEO."

    Better: "explains how Google picks which page to rank."

  • P-08Whether you're X or Y

    Whether you're a beginner or a pro, from startups to enterprises.

    Bad: "Whether you're a solo creator or a global brand, ..."

    Better: Say who it is actually for.

  • P-09Look no further

    look no further, you've come to the right place, this is your ultimate guide.

    Bad: "Looking for a scheduler? Look no further."

    Better: "FeedHive schedules posts to 10 platforms."

  • P-10Unlock the power

    unlock the power of, harness the potential of, take it to the next level.

    Bad: "Unlock the full potential of your content."

    Better: Say the specific gain.

  • P-11Here's the thing

    here's the thing, here's the deal, let me be clear, I'll be honest, I'll be straight with you.

    Bad: "Here's the thing: most people quit."

    Better: "Most people quit in month two."

  • P-12The truth is

    the truth is, the reality is, the uncomfortable truth, the hard truth.

    Bad: "The hard truth is that SEO takes time."

    Better: "SEO takes about six months to show results."

  • P-13Sign-off clichรฉs

    I hope this helps, happy writing, feel free to reach out, let me know if you have any questions.

    Bad: A post or article ending with "Hope this helps!"

    Better: End on the last useful point.

  • P-14Summary openers

    In conclusion, In summary, To sum up, Overall, All in all.

    Bad: "In conclusion, consistency is key."

    Better: End on the last concrete point; the reader was just there.

  • P-15Vague future

    the future is bright, the possibilities are endless, only time will tell, the sky's the limit.

    Bad: "With AI, the possibilities are endless."

    Better: Name one thing that is now possible.

Sentence patterns

Constructions that AI reaches for again and again.

  • S-01Not X, but Y

    "It's not X. It's Y." / "This isn't about X, it's about Y."

    Bad: "It's not a tool. It's a teammate."

    Better: Say what it does: "It drafts replies for you to approve."

  • S-02Not just X, but also Y

    "It's not just fast, it's also accurate."

    Bad: "Not just a scheduler, but a full content engine."

    Better: List what it does.

  • S-03The question isn't X

    "The question isn't whether, it's when." / "The problem isn't X. The problem is Y."

    Bad: "The question isn't if you should use AI. It's how."

    Better: "Here is how we use AI for first drafts."

  • S-04Negative listing

    "Not a X. Not a Y. A Z."

    Bad: "Not a plan. Not a hope. A system."

    Better: "A system: three posts a week, written on Mondays."

  • S-05Rhetorical Q and A

    A question the writer immediately answers.

    Bad: "Why does this matter? Because reach is everything."

    Better: "Reach decides how many people see the post."

  • S-06The obvious question

    "The obvious question is...", "You might be wondering..."

    Bad: "You might be wondering how this works."

    Better: Explain how it works.

  • S-07Colon reveal

    A short setup, a colon, then a dramatic reveal.

    Bad: "The best part: it's free."

    Better: "It's free."

  • S-08Faux insight

    "What nobody tells you", "the part most people miss", "here's what most get wrong".

    Bad: "What nobody tells you about growth: distribution beats product."

    Better: "Distribution brought us more users than any feature."

  • S-09This is where it gets interesting

    this is where it gets interesting, this changes everything, and that's where things get wild.

    Bad: "And this is where it gets interesting."

    Better: State the interesting thing.

  • S-10The useful part is

    the useful part, the part where, the best part, the exciting part, the part that stuck with me.

    Bad: "The useful part is that it connects to your inbox."

    Better: "It connects to your inbox."

  • S-11X is just Y

    Calling something "just" a vivid unrelated thing to make a point.

    Bad: "Posting without a plan is just gambling with your time."

    Better: "Without a plan you post less and repeat topics."

  • S-12Trailing -ing analysis

    A sentence ends with an -ing clause that tells you what it means.

    Bad: "Sales rose 20%, highlighting the strength of the brand."

    Better: "Sales rose 20%."

  • S-13Rule of three

    Lists of exactly three adjectives or phrases, by reflex.

    Bad: "fast, simple, and powerful."

    Better: Keep the one that is true and provable.

  • S-14Synonym cycling

    Rotating names for the same thing to avoid repetition.

    Bad: "The agent drafts. The assistant reviews. The tool publishes."

    Better: "The agent drafts, reviews and publishes."

  • S-15Arbitrary "one"

    Putting "one" before a noun to sound focused when the number means nothing.

    Bad: "Start with one workflow."

    Better: "Start with your weekly newsletter."

  • S-16Fake-strong verbs

    boasts, features, offers, maintains (instead of "has").

    Bad: "The app boasts an intuitive interface."

    Better: "The app has a drag-and-drop calendar."

  • S-17Imagine a world

    imagine a world where, picture this, what if I told you.

    Bad: "Imagine a world where your posts write themselves."

    Better: Describe what the product does today.

  • S-18Hedge stacking

    may potentially, could possibly, might help to, can sometimes.

    Bad: "This may potentially help improve results."

    Better: "This improved reply rate by 8% in our test." Or cut it.

  • S-19Both-sides filler

    "While X has benefits, it also has drawbacks."

    Bad: "While automation saves time, it's important to stay authentic."

    Better: Take a position and support it.

  • S-20From X to Y range

    "From startups to enterprises", "from strategy to execution".

    Bad: "From ideation to publication, we've got you covered."

    Better: Name the two steps you actually handle.

  • S-21Interpretive asides

    Telling the reader how to read the text.

    Bad: "That last point matters more than it sounds."

    Better: Show why it matters, or delete the aside.

  • S-22Rhetorical self-correction

    "Actually, let me rephrase that", "Or rather..."

    Bad: "It's fast. Or rather, it's instant."

    Better: "It's instant."

Structure and rhythm

Slop is often in the shape of the text, not the words.

  • R-01One-line paragraph stacks

    Many short lines in a row, each a slogan.

    Bad: "I quit my job. / I built a product. / Nobody came. / Then I learned this."

    Better: Write it as one paragraph.

  • R-02Fragment drumbeat

    Strings of fragments for rhythm.

    Bad: "Code. Content. Customers. Every day."

    Better: One full sentence that says what you do every day.

  • R-03Repeated starters

    Several lines that start with the same word or phrase.

    Bad: "It saves time. It saves money. It saves your sanity."

    Better: "It saves about four hours a week."

  • R-04Identical sentence shapes

    Every sentence the same length and structure.

    Bad: A paragraph of 12-word sentences, each "Subject verb object, comma, clause."

    Better: Vary length when it helps the point.

  • R-05List dumps

    Long inventories of nouns in one breath.

    Bad: "sales, marketing, support, ops, finance, hiring, legal and product."

    Better: Pick the two that matter here.

  • R-06Bullets for everything

    Bullet points where two sentences of prose would read better.

    Bad: Three bullets of four words each.

    Better: One sentence.

  • R-07Headings on tiny sections

    Headers over one or two sentences.

    Bad: "## Why it matters" followed by one line.

    Better: Fold it into the paragraph above.

  • R-08Recap ending

    A final paragraph that repeats the whole piece.

    Bad: "To recap, we covered A, B and C."

    Better: End on the last point or the next action.

  • R-09Mic-drop ending

    A final "deep" one-liner.

    Bad: "The future isn't coming. It's already here."

    Better: End on the clearest concrete sentence.

  • R-10Challenges and future outlook

    A formulaic "Despite challenges, the future looks promising" closer.

    Bad: "Despite these challenges, the outlook remains positive."

    Better: Name the challenge and what is being done.

  • R-11Fake-unscripted scaffolding

    "And honestly...", "And look...", "So yeah..." used as filler.

    Bad: "And honestly? That's when it clicked."

    Better: Say what clicked.

  • R-12Over-structured short answers

    A short reply split into sections with headers and bold labels.

    Bad: A three-sentence answer with "Overview", "Key Points" and "Conclusion".

    Better: Three sentences.

Imagery and metaphor

AI likes making things vivid when they should be clear.

  • M-01Cute metaphors

    Abstract things doing human or physical actions.

    Bad: "Your data is whispering insights."

    Better: "Your data shows Tuesday posts get more replies."

  • M-02Things that "live" or "sit"

    Data, products or agents that live or sit somewhere.

    Bad: "where your customer data lives."

    Better: "where your customer data is stored."

  • M-03Honest dashboards

    Systems that "get honest", "tell the truth", "hide" or "reveal".

    Bad: "Analytics finally get honest."

    Better: "Analytics now count only real views."

  • M-04Mixed and stacked metaphors

    Two or three images in one sentence.

    Bad: "a north star that fuels the engine of growth."

    Better: Drop both images and say what drives growth.

  • M-05Fuel and engine

    fuel, engine, rocket, catalyst, springboard, flywheel (as decoration).

    Bad: "content that fuels your growth engine."

    Better: "posts that bring in signups."

  • M-06Secret sauce

    secret sauce, magic, silver bullet, holy grail.

    Bad: "Consistency is the secret sauce."

    Better: "Accounts that posted weekly grew twice as fast."

Substance

The deepest kind of slop: text that sounds informative and says nothing.

  • C-01Importance puffery

    Inflating significance: "marks a pivotal moment", "a significant shift".

    Bad: "This marks a pivotal moment for the industry."

    Better: State the fact and let the reader judge.

  • C-02Vague attribution

    experts agree, studies show, many believe, it is widely regarded.

    Bad: "Studies show posting daily works."

    Better: Name the study, or cut the claim.

  • C-03Generic claims without receipts

    Claims any company could make.

    Bad: "AI can transform your business."

    Better: "Our AI drafts a week of posts from a 3-line brief."

  • C-04The portability test

    A sentence that could move unchanged to another company or topic.

    Bad: "We're committed to delivering value to our customers."

    Better: A sentence only you could write.

  • C-05Fake-profound wisdom

    Lines that sound deep and mean nothing concrete.

    Bad: "Growth is a mindset, not a metric."

    Better: Say what you measure and why.

  • C-06Smoothing the specific

    Replacing a sharp fact with a generic description.

    Bad: "a leading expert in the field."

    Better: "who wrote the Kubernetes scheduler."

  • C-07Made-up specifics

    Invented numbers, names or examples presented as real.

    Bad: "Sarah, a marketing manager, saved 10 hours a week." (no Sarah exists)

    Better: A real example, or none.

  • C-08Telling instead of showing

    Labeling something surprising, important or interesting.

    Bad: "Surprisingly, the simple version won."

    Better: "The simple version got twice the clicks."

  • C-09Canned notability

    "featured in top outlets", "widely recognized", "has an active social media presence".

    Bad: "She has been featured in numerous leading publications."

    Better: Name one, with a link.

  • C-10Superficial balance

    Every point gets a "however" so the text never commits.

    Bad: "AI is powerful. However, it has limitations."

    Better: Say which limitation matters for this reader.

  • C-11Advice with no steps

    Telling the reader to "optimize", "be strategic" or "stay consistent" without saying how.

    Bad: "Optimize your posting schedule."

    Better: "Post Tuesday to Thursday between 8 and 10am."

  • C-12Hollow promises

    "Everything you need to know", "the ultimate guide", "master X in minutes".

    Bad: "The ultimate guide to LinkedIn."

    Better: "How to write a LinkedIn post that gets replies."

Formatting and punctuation

  • F-01Em dash habit

    Em dashes used everywhere for rhythm.

    Bad: "It's fast โ€” really fast โ€” and free."

    Better: "It's fast and free." Use commas, periods or parentheses.

  • F-02Bold sprinkled mid-sentence

    Random words in bold for emphasis.

    Bad: "This is **really important** for **growth**."

    Better: No bold; let the sentence carry it.

  • F-03Emoji as bullets

    โœ… ๐Ÿš€ ๐Ÿ’ก ๐Ÿ‘‰ used as list markers or decoration.

    Bad: "โœ… Faster โœ… Cheaper โœ… Better"

    Better: A plain sentence.

  • F-04Title Case Headings

    Every Word Capitalized In Headings.

    Bad: "How To Grow Your Audience On LinkedIn"

    Better: "How to grow your audience on LinkedIn"

  • F-05Colon-label lines

    Every line starts with a bold label and a colon.

    Bad: "**Speed:** fast. **Price:** low. **Support:** great."

    Better: A sentence about the one that matters.

  • F-06Markdown in the wrong place

    Asterisks, hashtags or headers pasted into emails, posts or forms.

    Bad: "**Subject:** ..." inside a LinkedIn post.

    Better: Plain text.

  • F-07Curly-quote and character mix

    Curly quotes, special dashes and non-breaking spaces mixed with plain text.

    Bad: โ€œquotesโ€ next to "quotes" in one paragraph.

    Better: Pick one style.

  • F-08Exclamation inflation

    Exclamation marks on ordinary sentences.

    Bad: "We updated the settings page!"

    Better: "We updated the settings page."

  • F-09Unicode bold and fancy fonts in long posts

    ๐—•๐—ผ๐—น๐—ฑ or ๐“ˆ๐’ธ๐“‡๐’พ๐“…๐“‰ letters across whole lines.

    Bad: An entire LinkedIn post in Unicode bold.

    Better: Plain text, one bold phrase at most (screen readers can't read these).

  • F-10Tables for two facts

    A table where a sentence would do.

    Bad: A 2x2 table comparing price and speed.

    Better: "A is cheaper; B is faster."

Chatbot residue

Text that was clearly copied out of a chat window.

  • B-01Assistant openers

    Certainly!, Absolutely!, Great question!, Of course!

    Bad: "Certainly! Here's a LinkedIn post about..."

    Better: Delete it.

  • B-02Sycophancy

    You're absolutely right, what a great idea, I love this.

    Bad: An email reply starting "Great point, you're absolutely right!"

    Better: Answer the point.

  • B-03Offer to do more

    Would you like me to..., Let me know if you'd like a shorter version.

    Bad: A published post ending "Would you like me to adjust the tone?"

    Better: Delete it.

  • B-04Here is a...

    Lead-ins like "Here is a polished version of your post:" left in the final text.

    Better: Delete the line.

  • B-05Placeholder text

    [Your Name], [Company], [insert statistic], XX%.

    Better: Fill it in or cut the sentence.

  • B-06AI disclaimers

    As an AI, I don't have personal opinions; my knowledge is limited to...

    Better: Delete it.

  • B-07Source hedging

    "Based on available information", "specific details are limited".

    Bad: "While specific figures are not widely available, ..."

    Better: Find the figure or don't mention it.

  • B-08Citation debris

    Leftover markers like [1], contentReference, oaicite, turn0search0.

    Better: Remove them, and check the claim they were attached to.

Social media and LinkedIn

Patterns that turn a post into "LinkedIn slop".

  • L-01Broetry

    One sentence per line, top to bottom.

    Bad: A 20-line post where every line is a new sentence.

    Better: Short paragraphs.

  • L-02Hook formulas

    "I was fired. Best thing that ever happened.", "Unpopular opinion:", "Stop doing X."

    Better: Open with the specific thing that happened or the specific claim.

  • L-03Thrilled to announce

    I'm thrilled/excited/humbled to announce, I'm proud to share.

    Bad: "I'm thrilled to announce I've joined Acme!"

    Better: "I joined Acme to lead the growth team."

  • L-04Read that again

    Read that again., Let that sink in., I'll say it louder.

    Better: Delete it. If the line needs a second read, rewrite it.

  • L-05Agree? / Thoughts?

    Engagement-bait closers.

    Bad: "Agree? ๐Ÿ‘‡"

    Better: Ask a real question, or don't.

  • L-06The lesson list

    "Here are 7 lessons I learned from..." with generic lessons.

    Better: One lesson with the story behind it.

  • L-07Humblebrag setup

    "I don't usually post this, but...", "This might be controversial, but..."

    Better: Post it without the preamble.

  • L-08Thread markers

    ๐Ÿงต, 1/, "A thread" on content that isn't a thread.

    Better: Write the post.

  • L-09Hashtag walls

    Ten or more hashtags at the end.

    Better: Three relevant ones, or none.

  • L-10That's it. That's the post

    Self-aware closers that announce the ending.

    Bad: "That's it. That's the tweet."

    Better: Just stop.

  • L-11P.S. engagement

    "P.S. Repost โ™ป๏ธ if this helped." on every post.

    Better: Drop it, or use it rarely.

  • L-12No fluff, just value

    Announcing quality instead of delivering it: no fluff, just value; straight to the point; real talk.

    Better: Delete the announcement.

  • L-13Comment slop

    Generic replies: "Great insights!", "So true!", "Thanks for sharing, this is gold."

    Better: Reply to something specific in the post, or don't reply.

  • L-14Fake vulnerability arc

    "I failed. I was broke. Then I discovered X." built to sell.

    Better: Tell what happened, with dates and numbers.

  • L-15Contrarian template

    "Everyone says X. They're wrong."

    Better: Make your claim and back it up; skip the strawman.

How the AI Slop Detector works

  1. 1Paste your text into the box. Anything from a single post to a 5,000-character article works.
  2. 2Press Check for slop. An AI model compares your text with the pattern list below and quotes every match.
  3. 3Read the verdict. Two or more different patterns means Rejected. One pattern on its own is normal in human writing, so it still passes.
  4. 4Fix the highlighted lines using the suggestion under each finding, then check again.

AI slop detector or AI detector?

AI detectors try to tell you whether a person or a model wrote a text. They make mistakes in both directions, and a wrong answer can get a real person accused of cheating.

This tool asks a different question: does the text read like slop? It points to the exact words and structures that make writing feel generic, so you can see the problem and decide for yourself. A person can write slop, and a model can write clean text. The patterns are what matter.

Use the list with your own AI

The full list is open source on GitHub under the MIT license. It includes a skill file for Claude Code, Codex and other agents, plus the patterns as JSON for your own tools.

Give the list to your AI before it writes and ask it to avoid every pattern. You'll spend less time cleaning up the draft afterwards.

Frequently asked questions

Is this an AI detector?

No. It doesn't guess whether AI wrote your text. It checks for patterns that make writing read like AI slop, quotes each one and suggests a fix. Those patterns show up in human writing too.

What counts as AI slop?

Writing that sounds produced rather than written: filler words like delve and leverage, formulas like "It's not X, it's Y", one-line paragraph stacks, invented specifics and vague claims. The list on this page covers 120 of these patterns in nine categories.

Why was my text rejected for only two patterns?

Most slop is several patterns stacked together, so two or more different patterns is where text starts to read as generic. One pattern on its own passes. Fix the highlighted lines and check again.

Do you store the text I check?

No. FeedHive doesn't save the text. It's sent to an AI model for the check and the result is shown only to you.

Is the AI Slop Detector free?

Yes. It's free with no signup, up to 30 checks a day. The pattern list is open source under the MIT license, so you can use it anywhere.

Write without the slop

Want posts that sound like you? Try FeedHive.

FeedHive AI learns your brand voice and drafts posts in it. Then it schedules them to LinkedIn, Instagram, X, Threads, TikTok and more from one calendar.

Try FeedHive for free